News Desk
TikTok and its Chinese parent company are challenging a new American law that would effectively ban the popular video-sharing app in the U.S. unless it’s sold to an approved buyer. In a lawsuit filed Tuesday in the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for Washington D.C., ByteDance argues that the law unfairly targets the platform and constitutes an unprecedented attack on free speech.
Signed by President Joe Biden on April 24 as part of a larger foreign aid package, the law marks the first time the U.S. has targeted a social media company for potential banning. Critics argue this move mirrors tactics employed by repressive regimes like those in Iran and China.
The lawsuit contends that the law portrays ByteDance’s ownership of TikTok as a national security threat without evidence, circumventing the First Amendment. ByteDance argues that complying with the law would necessitate divesting TikTok, a task it deems technologically and legally unfeasible, especially within the 270 days outlined by the law. The company also argues that divesting the U.S. TikTok platform from its global operations would create an isolated entity detached from its user base.
Furthermore, TikTok and ByteDance assert that the law violates the First Amendment’s protection of freedom of expression. They seek a declaratory judgment that the law is unconstitutional.
While the Justice Department declined to comment on the lawsuit, and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre refrained from addressing the issue, Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi defended the law, stating it addresses national security concerns.
Experts anticipate ByteDance may seek a preliminary injunction to temporarily block the law’s enforcement. The decision on this injunction could significantly impact the case’s outcome.
The dispute over TikTok arises within the broader context of U.S.-China tensions, particularly concerning technology and data security. Lawmakers and officials express concerns about potential data privacy breaches and manipulation of content by Chinese authorities.
- ATTENTION: Techrectory gives ₦5,000 monthly to our top readers, CLICK HERE to become a winner.
Opponents of the law argue that banning TikTok isn’t an effective solution to data privacy concerns and emphasize the need for comprehensive privacy legislation. They question the government’s evidence supporting claims of national security risks posed by TikTok.
Jameel Jaffer, executive director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, anticipates TikTok’s lawsuit to succeed, citing First Amendment protections. However, the bipartisan nature of the law may influence judicial deference to congressional determinations regarding national security risks.
In summary, the lawsuit underscores the complex intersection of free speech, national security, and technology regulation in the digital age.
Techrectory with Agency Report.
ADVERTISMENT
- —Are you looking for a professional website design company to build your website? Then, contact AGGITAL WORKS.
